Aldermen considering action on satellite dish unsightly placement

The board of aldermen appears to be poised to tackle one of Everett’s “eyesore” problems – the glut of satellite dishes on local homes.

Ald. Robert Van Campen informed his colleagues earlier this week that he has prepared a draft ordinance to address the “dish problem” and will present it to the committee on rules and ordinances at its next session.

The Ward Five lawmaker said some houses have four or five dishes and they’re usually placed on the front of the dwelling, although he noted that in one instance, he’s seen a satellite dish attached to a tree.

The abundance of the dishes and their unsightly placement on local homes have gotten out of hand, said Van Campen.

He maintains that some rules and regulations are needed to eliminate the eyesore situations.

The cities of Boston and Revere are also targeting “dish problems” in their communities.

East Boston Councillor Salvatore LaMattina has unveiled his proposal that seeks to ban satellite dishes in the Hub from being placed on the front of a dwelling, unless the subscriber can’t get a signal from any other part of the building.

LaMattina addressed the Revere City Council earlier this week because Beach City legislators are also very serious about enacting a measure to deal with the “dish problem” that they have.

“The satellite companies should be responsible for the placement and removal of the dishes because it’s a quality of life issue, but they’re not,” asserted LaMattina.

At this week’s aldermanic meeting, it was suggested that the local rules and ordinances committee should get a copy of Boston’s proposal to see if it can be helpful in finalizing an ordinance for the city of Everett.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Rebecca-Furr/1163512838 Rebecca Furr

    Kill them all and let the dog god sort them out. Worthless, ill bred, POS mutant dogs.

    • Pitlover

      Ok Hitler.

      • Spock

        So let’s bring in the National Defamation League too to get their comment about your comparison of the value of the lives of Jews to the lives of dogs. You are a shining example of the pro-pit bull lunacy that exists, and you provide great examples of why owners of these dogs simply can not be trusted, because their internal moral value system is so screwed up that they have an absolute disregard for the value of human life that they are simply reckless and irresponsible, and like ignorant children, their dangerous toys need to kept away from them. Now if we could only put pit bull owners into an arena like The Hunger Games and let them kill each other off, Darwin’s theory could be helpful.

  • Kaynine35

    Neil Kimmon is the classic case of a politican who is so ignorant and arrogant that he does not even realize what a fool he makes of himself.

    He claims the highly educated vet from from Tufts “lacks credibilty” – yet check out this unbelieveable goobly-gosh he writes:

    “The new ordinance defines the breed as “shall mean any pit bull, American Staffordshire, Staffordshire Pit Bull Terrier, Bull Terrier or mix of the aforementioned breeds.“ The Doctor promoting non BSL from Tufts, a Cambridge resident, who testified before the City Council stated the claim that you could not identify pit bulls based upon her study. She stated that her study testing DNA showed that these dogs were not pure bread Staffordshire ….. ”

    “Bread” Really??? Bread??? What is that? Wheat or rye dogs?

    On top of that he clearly knows NOTHING about dog breeds:

    What is an American Staffordshire?

    What is Staffordshire Pit bull Terrier ??

    Neither one of these are recognized breeds of dogs.

    And does he know the “Bull Terrier” is the official AKC name for the “Target Dog”?? I am sure he doesn’t have a clue.

    How on earth can he claim that the Vet’s claim you cannot ID a breed of dog is wrong, when he cannot even list the breeds correctly?????

    Obviously nothing Kimmon says has an factual basis – he doesn’t even know what types or breeds of dogs he is even talking about…

    Disgusting…

  • SweetiePie625

    I understand that the mayor has opened some kind of poll about the issue. That as usual, the pit-bull fans are trying to flood this poll with their votes from all over the world. I hope the mayor of this town is sensible enough not to let people from outside the city have any say at all in how residents have to live. That he doesn’t forget who he was elected to represent — and that it certainly wasn’t people from the other side of the country or world.

  • Sdasd

    Finally! They are so ugly. Makes the homes and town look cheap.

  • Frank

    So its just Dog du’jour with you?

    Anybody who cites Dogsbite.org should be sent out with the dishwater.

    http://www.ucdenver.edu/about/newsroom/newsreleases/Pages/DogBiteConcern.aspx
    A Medical University Study ie. Real Science (not an unscientific study done by dogsbite.org using only sensationalized media headlines)

    “Some wounds are so severe that patients require multiple plastic and reconstructive surgeries.”

    In Denver where Pit Bulls are banned. But wait they should have ZERO POINT ZERO DOG ATTACKS RIGHT?????? If bans work in protecting the safety of children

    “I was called in to see a dog bite. A girl had a puncture wound to her lip. Two days later I saw the same girl, but this time her eyelids were torn off and she had severe scalp and ear lacerations,”

    How could that happen in an area where the only dangerous dog in the world the Pit Bull terrier is banned….Sorry kids, you were attacked by the wrong breed of dog

  • Denver Parent

    Ah, Jason….Denver has a total of Zero (0) Pit Bull maulings during the time its ban has been enforced. Not one limb has been ripped off, not one scalp has been torn off, not one child has had their skull crushed or pierced by a dog’s jaw. No one ever, ever, ever said BSL would prevent all dog bite injuries – just the worst ones – the one the only forensic medical studies ever performed compared to Shark Attacks. Both the University of Texas Study and the Detroit Coroner’s Office study confirm this.
    http://www.dogsbite.org is the only group that monitors and reports the national pit bull maulings, and their statistics are self-authenticating.
    Each and ever well written pit bull ban has been upheld by courts across the country for one reason – the scientific evidence clearly establishes a logical and rational basis for the ban because Pit Bulls have been proven to have a higher likelihood of inflicting massive damage, injury, or death upon their victims than other breeds.

    The difference between other breeds and pit bulls is like the difference between firecrackers and hand grenades: No one can statistically determine the probability of an unintentional detonation, but the difference in potential damage is so remarkable as to instantly label one more dangerous than the other.

    Stop playing with hand grenades in my neighborhood. If you want to kill yourself, please do so in your own community.

  • Victim Advocate

    Trish, Trish, Trish, you ignorant Sl. Let me pick the pit bulls to put through the ATTS test, and I guarantee you a completely different result! The ATTS has admitted their test results are not based upon a random sample of a universal population, but a self-selected group. If Kujo kills you, the evidence is apparent. The AVMA is a joke; they have a politically vested interest in not biting the hand that feeds them. The fact you value the life of a dog over the lives of humans just proves the completely upside world you live in, Alice.

  • Spock

    Here is a list of those who put Humans first:
    Rational human beings….

    I notice your list does not include any group of first responders, emergency room medical professional, plastic surgeons, physical therapists, or coroners.

    Oh, you forgot that PETA supports the complete elimination of the breed….

  • Korynparker

    Stop the presses……are you so irrational, so emotional disturbed as to dare to compare the Civil Rights Movement of the NAACP, and their continual struggle against discrimination based upon human skin color to your personal preference for a specific breed of a dog?
    Let’s call Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton & President Obama for a comment….stupid.

  • Frank

    I don’t have Denver’s total dog bite numbers. I’ve looked, and I’ve never seen them published anywhere, nor have they been given to me when I’ve requested them. It seems odd to me that a city that has been to court FOUR TIMES in the past 3 years would not have widely published their “success” if these numbers looked good…but I don’t know for sure.

    So why would dogsbite.org not share with you these numbers? It’s because they could really care less about public safety. The owner of the website got attacked by a ‘pit bull’ about 14 months ago..and in her quest for vengeance, she is out pushing breed bans regardless of what the end results would be. Colleen Lynn is a victim of an attack. That is tragic. But she is NOT an expert in dog bites, canine behavior, or canine legislation. She is a person with a website that is seeking vengeance. In her quest to thwart truth, she weeds out any comments that counter her view.

    San Francisco
    In the 19 months prior to the mandatory spay/neuter of pit bulls law, they had a total of 596 total bites. In the 19 months following the ban, 676. A 13% increase. Don’t believe my numbers? Here’s an academic paper written by TE Houston, PhD from out of Sacramento that also notes no decline in bites following the passing of the ordinance.

    http://www.kcdogadvocates.org/dnn/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=36c14tPWR6I%3d&tabid=84&mid=481

    Douglass Wolfe is the biggest waste of sperm and egg this planet has ever offered.

  • Frank

    PETA Kills around 90% of the animals they take in because “hey they are better off dead”

    Here are 2 PETA employees on trial for animal cruelty

    Why would i listen to them when it came to animal welfare?
    http://www.roanoke-chowannewsherald.com/2007/01/24/testimony-underway-in-peta-trial/

  • Frank

    ” if there were as many pit bulls in Malden as people, and bite incidents were classified as aggravated assaults, the average rate of aggravated assault by pit bulls in the last three years would have been over 1,500 per year. ”

    We’re not allowed to compare dogs to people but you hate and death mongers are…..sound rational logic.

    Why dont you just admit that you think that only black people ie Thugs and gangsters and drug dealers in your mind own these dogs and you hate black people. You cant take away thier rights overtly, you just try to target them in round about ways. Go vote for Strom Thurmand you republican fraud.

    Hating something because of what it looks like, not because of its own actions is the definition of irrational fear hate and prejudice. Its called racism in people, breedism in dogs, its obviously not the same thing, or on the same level, but its an allele on the same ignorance gene

  • Frank

    so you criticize a self selction bias, by suggesting you getting your own self selection bias so that you could manipulate the results. Have you ever even heard of statistical theory sampling, and the scientific method?
    So you are saying that the AVMA only cares about money and that they protect to the end of the earth…the “5%”???? of pit bulls nationally as your so ‘perfect’ statistics reflect….doesnt make much sense to put your medical license and practice on the line to protect such a small fraction of dog owners. You pit bull haters use backwards nonsense logic. Nobody values the life of a dog over a human, but a dog that hasnt done anything shouldnt be subjugated to a ridiculous law because of some other dog that happened to look like it that has a TWAT for an owner. Responsible pit bull owners dont want to deal with this bullshit anymore than you haters do, WE ALSO WANT THE WRECKLESS OWNERS DEALT WITH DONT YOU GET IT!!!

  • Betty Geist

    Talk about cruelty. hope you all are proud of what you with your BSL law Denver and all the other city’s.
    BSL places unreasonable burden on responsible dog owners,
    tears family apart and
    KILLS INNOCENT DOGS
    TAKE A REAL GOOD LOOK

  • Trish Brumfield

    I am also a responsible bully breed owner that works, pays taxes and is a valued member of society.

  • Trish Brumfield

    …..